• Home
  • Soft Skills
    • Adaptability
    • Confidence
    • Change Management
    • Unlearning and Learning
    • Collaboration and Teamwork
    • Cultural Sensitivity
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Economics
    • Introduction to Managerial Economics >
      • Basic Techniques
      • The firm: Stakeholders, Objectives and Decision Issues
      • Scope of Managerial Economics
    • Demand and Revenue Analysis >
      • Demand Estimation and Forecasting
      • Demand Elasticity
      • Demand Concepts and Analysis
    • Prodution and Cost Analysis >
      • Production Function
      • Estimation of Production and Cost Functions
      • Cost Concepts and Analysis I
      • Cost Concepts and Analysis II
    • Pricing Decisions >
      • Pricing strategies
      • Market structure and microbes barriers to entry
      • Pricing under pure competition and pure monopoly
      • Pricing under monopolistic and oligopolistic competition
    • Narendra Modi Development Model of Gujarat
  • JBDON Golf
  • Let's Talk
  • MBA Project Sharing
  • About Us
  • CET Knowledge Zone
    • Tips From JBIMS Students >
      • Prasad Sawant
      • Chandan Roy
      • Ram
      • Ashmant Tiwari
      • Rajesh Rikame
      • Ami Kothari
      • Ankeet Adani
      • Sonam Jain
      • Mitesh Thakker
      • Tresa Sankoorikal
    • Speed Techniques
    • CET Workshops

BALANCE SCORE CARD

The Balanced Scorecard model offers a way for a corporation to gain a wider perspective on its strategicdecisions by considering the impact on finances, customers, internal processes and employee learning. Theanalysis takes into account financial and non-financial measures, internal improvements, past outcomes andongoing requirements as indications of future performance. IT departments are applying the model to helpkeep e-commerce, supply-chain management and other business-focused projects on track.

When US West Inc. in Denver recently undertook an e-commerce initiative, the company put the Balanced
Scorecard model to work, says Rod Mack, the company's general manager of software development. Based
on the theory that for every action there's an equal and opposite reaction, the model helps companies
determine what impact a potential change will have on the rest of the organization, looking at it from four
perspectives: finance, customers, internal processes, and innovation and learning for employees.

"For our e-commerce initiative to be successful, it wasn't just the e-commerce platform," says Mack. Starting
with that customer-facing goal, the Balanced Scorecard approach defined goals in other areas: internal
processes, employee impact and finances, he says.

For US West's 4,500-person information technology department, that meant getting the associated computer
systems Y2K-compliant in the internal processes category, implementing an IT career structure in the
employee learning category and meeting overall budget commitments in the financial category.

Business Beyond Finances
Some organizations like US West are beginning to accept Balanced Scorecard analysis for assessing roll outs
of new technology. Instead of focusing solely on a company's financial goal, the model requires decisionmakers
to consider the impact of strategic decisions on staff, customers and the organization's function

"In the past, a lot of these might have been the same goals, but it's easier to organize your thoughts around
this. We even used Balanced Scorecard as the framework for all our 2000 planning," Mack says. The regional
Bell operating company has been using Balanced Scorecard for the past year and a half to gauge successful
project implementations, he says.

Robert Kaplan and David Norton, who coined the term in a 1992 Harvard Business Review article (see
“Balanced Scorecard’s Origins”, created the Balanced Scorecard concept. Many Fortune 500 companies use it
to assess the full impact of their corporate strategies, ferreting out any unintended consequences to their
workforces, their customers or their bottom lines that could occur when they alter a production process, for
example.

"When companies look at setting strategies and goals, they classically fall into setting financial objectives:
increasing revenue or return on assets. But Balanced Scorecard says that's looking in the rearview mirror,"
says Ken Rau, director of the information risk management practice at KPMG Peat Marwick LLP. He uses
the methodology to advise companies on how to avoid negative consequences when implementing
strategies.

"Balanced Scorecard says companies need to be proactive. In addition to looking at the financial metrics,
they should look at how they're serving customers, employees and internal processes," says Rau, who
worked with Norton in the late 1980s. "You take each objective and ask what the specific initiatives to
accomplish are. What about the people, the processes, the customers and the financials? You figure out how
to measure each of these areas. It's not what to do from one vantage point — the almighty dollar."
In addition, IT department could use Balanced Scorecard to assess the impact of a corporate strategy to enter
a new business line and to determine how IT could link itself to support the parent company's goal, Rau
says. Alternatively, IT could use the model to track its own initiatives, such as how moving to a different
hardware platform would affect the department's processes, budget, training requirements and the user
groups it serves within the corporation.

"While an IS department can make significant improvements as a separate department, the IS department is
really the foundation for the entire company's Balanced Scorecard effort," says Jim Brigman, co-founder and
chief operating officer at Acorn Systems Inc. in Houston. Brigman received his master's degree from
Harvard University under the tutelage of Kaplan.

Measurable Goals
Brigman says IT managers developing a Balanced Scorecard for their projects should take the following
steps to develop measurable goals in each of the model's four areas of concern:
  • Internal processes: Define the crucial capabilities and purposes of the IT department.
  • Finances: Weigh the cost of an IT project against the benefits it will deliver and the operational impact it will
have on the rest of the company.
  • Customers: Consider the impact of IT projects on the user community and how any IT projects will
influence users' opinions of its performance.
  • Employee innovation and learning: Determine whether any planned projects will fill the need of IT
employees for continual development.

"Any company implementing the Balanced Scorecard that has not made the IS department central to this
task has missed the boat," Brigman says. "The IS department controls the company's data. They are the
crucial group responsible for transforming data into information."
Instead of being a planning tool used only by executive management, the Balanced Scorecard model can
clarify roles and expectations at all corporate levels, Mack says.

"From each executive director to each area manager, they can see how their specific goals tie to the entire
organization's software management objectives," says Mack. "I think it's a pretty powerful tool for setting
the organization's goals."

Balanced Scorecard Origin
The originators of the Balanced Scorecard concept are Robert S. Kaplan and David Norton, co- authors of
The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action (Harvard Business School Press, 1996). They
coined the term "Balanced Scorecard" in a 1992 article for the Harvard Business Review. The article, "The
Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance," is available at the Harvard Business School
Publishing
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.