Portfolio Analysis
Attractiveness
→Strength
→Position
→Strategy
In This Article
Introduction
The GE McKinsey Matrix (also called the GE Nine-Cell Matrix) was developed by McKinsey for General Electric in the 1970s. It's a more sophisticated alternative to the BCG Matrix, using multiple factors to assess industry attractiveness and competitive strength.
The Two Dimensions
Industry Attractiveness (Y-axis)
Composite measure of external factors:
- Market size and growth rate
- Industry profitability
- Competitive intensity
- Technological requirements
- Environmental/regulatory factors
- Entry barriers
Competitive Strength (X-axis)
Composite measure of internal capabilities:
- Market share
- Brand strength
- Production capacity
- Profit margins relative to competitors
- Technological capability
- Management strength
The Nine Cells
| Strong | Medium | Weak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Attractiveness | Invest/Grow | Invest/Grow | Selectivity |
| Medium Attractiveness | Invest/Grow | Selectivity | Harvest/Divest |
| Low Attractiveness | Selectivity | Harvest/Divest | Harvest/Divest |
Strategic Implications
- Invest/Grow (Green): Priority for investment—strong position in attractive industry
- Selectivity (Yellow): Selective investment—strengthen or exit
- Harvest/Divest (Red): Minimize investment—extract cash or divest
Constructing the Matrix
Step 1: Define Factors
Identify relevant factors for each dimension
Step 2: Assign Weights
Weight factors by importance (must sum to 1.0)
Step 3: Rate Each SBU
Score each factor 1-5 for each business unit
Step 4: Calculate Scores
Weighted score = Σ(weight × rating)
Step 5: Plot on Matrix
Position each SBU; circle size = revenue
Example Calculation
Industry Attractiveness: Market growth (0.3 × 4) + Profitability (0.3 × 3) + Competition (0.4 × 2) = 2.9 (Medium)
GE Matrix vs BCG Matrix
| Feature | BCG Matrix | GE McKinsey |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 2 (growth, share) | 2 (composite measures) |
| Cells | 4 | 9 |
| Factors | Single factor per axis | Multiple weighted factors |
| Flexibility | Limited | Customizable |
| Complexity | Simple | More complex |
Conclusion
Key Takeaways
- GE Matrix uses industry attractiveness × competitive strength
- Nine cells provide more nuanced strategic guidance than BCG's four
- Multiple factors weighted by importance for each dimension
- Green zone: Invest and grow
- Yellow zone: Selective investment
- Red zone: Harvest or divest
- More comprehensive but subjective than BCG